[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1472029735.2780.3.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:08:55 +0200
From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
To: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fabio.estevam@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: add cpuidle support for i.mx6ul
Am Donnerstag, den 25.08.2016, 00:13 +0800 schrieb Anson Huang:
> This patch enables cpuidle driver for i.MX6UL, it
> reuses i.MX6SX's cpuidle driver, 3 levels of cpuidle
> supported:
>
> 1. ARM WFI;
> 2. SOC in WAIT mode;
> 3. SOC in WAIT mode + ARM power off.
>
> As i.MX6UL has cortex-A7 CORE with an internal L2
> cache, so need to add L2 cache type check to decide
> if to flush L2 when entering idle with ARM power off,
> this is different from i.MX6SX which has PL310 external
> L2 cache.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c | 10 ++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> index 41cdce6..b4fcc8ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c
> @@ -9,14 +9,21 @@
> #include <linux/cpuidle.h>
> #include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> #include <asm/cpuidle.h>
> #include <asm/suspend.h>
>
> #include "common.h"
> #include "cpuidle.h"
>
> +static bool pl310_available;
> +
> static int imx6sx_idle_finish(unsigned long val)
> {
> + /* check if need to flush internal L2 cache */
> + if (!pl310_available)
> + flush_cache_all();
I think this is only necessary when entering the deepest idle state with
the ARM core powered off, right? It's a serious overhead for the shallow
idle states.
Also flush_cache_all() only flushes architected/inner caches, so it
should do the right thing for this use-case even if the outer PL310
cache is present. There is no need to make this conditional.
Regards,
Lucas
> cpu_do_idle();
>
> return 0;
> @@ -101,5 +108,8 @@ int __init imx6sx_cpuidle_init(void)
> imx_gpc_set_arm_power_up_timing(2, 1);
> imx_gpc_set_arm_power_down_timing(1, 1);
>
> + if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,pl310-cache"))
> + pl310_available = true;
> +
> return cpuidle_register(&imx6sx_cpuidle_driver, NULL);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> index c2cd61c..9c5e8f3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6ul.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <asm/mach/map.h>
>
> #include "common.h"
> +#include "cpuidle.h"
>
> static void __init imx6ul_enet_clk_init(void)
> {
> @@ -80,6 +81,8 @@ static void __init imx6ul_init_irq(void)
>
> static void __init imx6ul_init_late(void)
> {
> + imx6sx_cpuidle_init();
> +
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ)) {
> imx6_pm_opp_init();
> platform_device_register_simple("imx6q-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists