[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZa+sr8gAA3zD2-Kb+Pdsiw4ZEmbLRqC5NvCYDSJTta4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:50:53 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: include/linux/io-mapping.h:130:39: error: implicit declaration of
function 'ioremap_wc'
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:14:57AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 5:08 PM, kbuild test robot
>> I think I've finally fixed this now by making OF_GPIO depend on !NO_IOMEM.
>
> I've stumbled over this patch
(...)
> Fix this by including <linux/io-mapping.h> explicitly.
>
> having touched io-mapping.h
>
> The original patch is incorrect as io-mapping.h is not the right header
> for iounmap() - that is #include <linux/io.h> (pulling in <asm/io.h>)
> which is (and was) already present.
You're right, I'll revert this patch.
> So the root cause here is arch/um not supplying enough stubs?
arch/um is explicitly not supporting IOMEM so anyone code
using iomap()/iounmap() have to make sure they do not get
compiled on UM.
> But in the
> meantime, do you mind removing the incorrect include now that you have a
> w/a to keep 0day quiet? :)
OK
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists