[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe9a9667-cbbb-8fa2-5db0-2edd3220ca7b@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:48:38 +1000
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michael Neuling <michael.neuling@....ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] cpuidle: Allow idle-states to be disabled at
start
On 25/08/16 00:44, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/19/2016 12:26 AM, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
>> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Currently all the idle states registered by a cpu-idle driver are
>> enabled by default. This patch adds a mechanism which allows the
>> driver to hint if an idle-state should start in a disabled state. The
>> cpu-idle core will use this hint to appropriately initialize the
>> usage->disable knob of the CPU device idle state.
>
> Why do you need to do that ?
>
I think patch 2/2 explains the reason as it uses this infrastructure
Balbir Singh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists