[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVff3Y9CoZftPR7tuzJLb6Hsc4CCQZL-ihM9zsFHi0FsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 08:27:40 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] virtually mapped stacks
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:12 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>> > Andy Lutomirski (3):
>> > fork: Add generic vmalloced stack support
>> > dma-api: Teach the "DMA-from-stack" check about vmapped stacks
>> > x86/mm/64: Enable vmapped stacks
>>
>>
>> Hi Ingo-
>>
>> Is this a good format for this series? Is there anything I need to do?
>
> It's all looking good to me - just needed a quiet moment to line it all up, as
> it's a bit risky all around.
>
Thanks!
I've rebased the rest of the pile onto tip:x86/asm (Brian's switch_to
changes conflicted a bit). I'll test it a bit more, let the 0-day bot
chew on it a bit, and I'll email it out in a couple of days.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists