linux-kernel - Re: [Regression?] Commit cb4f71c429 deliberately changes order of network interfaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160824201531.4618fdcf@free-electrons.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:15:31 +0200
From:   Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@...il.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [Regression?] Commit cb4f71c429 deliberately changes order of
 network interfaces

Hello,

On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:10:04 +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:

> Going forward, as we disagree and it's basically a political decision,
> whom do we ask to rule here? Linus?

I don't think Linus will care about random issues on a random
platform :-)

The people who can take this decision are rather the maintainers of the
platform itself, or possibly the arm-soc maintainers if you still don't
like what the platform maintainers decided.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com