[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4265fdc-1624-7c40-5779-786bdb63375d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:15:39 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: rename switch operations structure
On 08/23/2016 09:38 AM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Now that the dsa_switch_driver structure contains only function pointers
> as it is supposed to, rename it to the more appropriate dsa_switch_ops,
> uniformly to any other operations structure in the kernel.
>
> No functional changes here, basically just the result of something like:
> s/dsa_switch_driver *drv/dsa_switch_ops *ops/g
>
> However keep the {un,}register_switch_driver functions and their
> dsa_switch_drivers list as is, since they represent the -- likely to be
> deprecated soon -- legacy DSA registration framework.
>
> In the meantime, also fix the following checks from checkpatch.pl to
> make it happy with this patch:
>
> CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!ops"
> #403: FILE: net/dsa/dsa.c:470:
> + if (ops == NULL) {
>
> CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "ds->ops->get_strings"
> #773: FILE: net/dsa/slave.c:697:
> + if (ds->ops->get_strings != NULL)
>
> CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "ds->ops->get_ethtool_stats"
> #824: FILE: net/dsa/slave.c:785:
> + if (ds->ops->get_ethtool_stats != NULL)
>
> CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "ds->ops->get_sset_count"
> #835: FILE: net/dsa/slave.c:798:
> + if (ds->ops->get_sset_count != NULL)
>
> total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 4 checks, 784 lines checked
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Thanks!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists