[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160825151753.GG10063@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 12:17:53 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
wangnan0@...wei.com, hemant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mpetlan@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf uprobe: Skip prologue if program compiled
without optimization
Em Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 03:59:43PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 09:50:04PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > > After applying patch:
> > >
> > > $ ./perf probe -x ./test 'foo i'
> > > $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
> > > p:probe_test/foo /home/ravi/test:0x0000000000000541 i=-4(%bp):s32
> > >
> > > $ ./perf record -e probe_test:foo ./test
> > > $ ./perf script
> > > test 6300 [001] 5877.879327: probe_test:foo: (400541) i=42
> > >
> > > No need to skip prologue for optimized case since debug info is correct
> > > for each instructions for -O2 -g. For more details please visit:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612253#c6
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > Looks good for me:)
> >
> > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> >
> > Jiri, Michael, please try this. Ravi's patch can fix your problem.
>
> yes, that fixes the problem for me
Ok, so I'll add a Tested-by: Jiri, ok? And push it via perf/urgent.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists