linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] i2c: mux: inform the i2c mux core about how it is used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160825162432.GF2856@katana>
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:24:32 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Crestez Dan Leonard <leonard.crestez@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] i2c: mux: inform the i2c mux core about how it is
 used

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 06:22:37PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2016-08-25 18:19, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c
> >> index 3cb8af635db5..f052c3067791 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c
> >> @@ -349,7 +349,8 @@ static int pca9541_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >>  	force = 0;
> >>  	if (pdata)
> >>  		force = pdata->modes[0].adap_id;
> >> -	muxc = i2c_mux_alloc(adap, &client->dev, 1, sizeof(*data), 0,
> >> +	muxc = i2c_mux_alloc(adap, &client->dev, 1, sizeof(*data),
> >> +			     I2C_MUX_ARBITRATOR,
> > 
> > Does it make sense to rename the file to i2c-arb-* somewhen then? Just
> > asking, I'll apply the patch anyhow.
> 
> There should be a clean branch with /only/ this series that both i2c and
> iio can share, to prevent merge problems. I said I'd make such a branch
> in the i2c-mux repo, but you are of course also welcome to provide that
> branch if you prefer...

No, this is fine. Send me a pull request and I'll merge.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)