[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160825195128.GD3296@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:51:28 +0200
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Cristina Moraru <cristina.moraru09@...il.com>,
"vegard.nossum@...il.com" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
teg@...m.no, kay@...y.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, backports@...r.kernel.org,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"rafael.j.wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
Sathya Prakash Veerichetty <sathya.prakash@...adcom.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jej B <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, danijons@...dent.chalmers.se,
Andrzej Wasowski <wasowski@....dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Add CONFIG symbol as module attribute
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:00:20AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> > The other nice thing is that we could probably fold most of the
> > Makefiles into Kconfig using that methods as well, by listing the
> > objectes required for a module, e.g.
> >
> > module NVME_TARGET
> > tristate "NVMe Target support"
> > depends on BLOCK
> > depends on CONFIGFS_FS
> > name nvmet
> > objects core.o configfs.o admin-cmd.o io-cmd.o fabrics-cmd.o
> > objects discovery.o
> >
>
> If this was going to be a thing, then you might also have
>
> config NVME_TARGET_FOO
> bool "NVMe target supports FOO"
> module NVME_TARGET
> objects foo.o
You mean this instead of a Makefile:
foo-$(CONFIG_NVME_TARGET_FOO) += foo.o
?
> The "module" would be like a "depends on" plus giving the module for
> generating the Makefile, and now you can really remove most Makefile
> stuff... :)
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists