[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160825032321.6prk373j72qe6aie@treble>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:23:21 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] livepatch/module: make TAINT_LIVEPATCH module-specific
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:33:00PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> There's no reliable way to determine which module tainted the kernel
> with CONFIG_LIVEPATCH. For example, /sys/module/<klp module>/taint
> doesn't report it. Neither does the "mod -t" command in the crash tool.
>
> Make it crystal clear who the guilty party is by converting
> CONFIG_LIVEPATCH to a module taint flag.
>
> This changes the behavior a bit: now the the flag gets set when the
> module is loaded, rather than when it's enabled.
>
> Reviewed-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>
Sorry, another typo. Should be:
Reported-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists