[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CwLPBTxXx=L8P6yjQ31zS_uwks=0D5710HLRau0DkiuXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:27:02 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix the intention to re-evalute tick dependency
for offline cpu
Ping Peterz, :)
2016-08-04 17:51 GMT+08:00 Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
>
> The dl task will be replenished after dl task timer fire and start a new
> period. It will be enqueued and to re-evaluate its dependency on the tick
> in order to restart it. However, if cpu is hot-unplug, irq_work_queue will
> splash since the target cpu is offline.
>
> As a result:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at kernel/irq_work.c:69 irq_work_queue_on+0xad/0xe0
> Call Trace:
> dump_stack+0x99/0xd0
> __warn+0xd1/0xf0
> warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
> irq_work_queue_on+0xad/0xe0
> tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu+0x44/0x50
> tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu+0x74/0xb0
> enqueue_task_dl+0x226/0x480
> activate_task+0x5c/0xa0
> dl_task_timer+0x19b/0x2c0
> ? push_dl_task.part.31+0x190/0x190
>
> This can be triggered by hot-unplug the full dynticks cpu which dl task
> is running on.
>
> Actually we don't need to restart the tick since the target cpu is offline
> and nothing need scheduler tick. This patch fix it by not intend to re-evaluate
> tick dependency if the cpu is offline.
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
> Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7f2cae4..43b494f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -628,6 +628,9 @@ bool sched_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)
> {
> int fifo_nr_running;
>
> + if (unlikely(!rq->online))
> + return true;
> +
> /* Deadline tasks, even if single, need the tick */
> if (rq->dl.dl_nr_running)
> return false;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists