linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc: fsl_pci: fix inbound ATMU entries for systems with >4G RAM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DB5PR0401MB1928CAFDC18E2D3C2612F21B91EC0@DB5PR0401MB1928.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:41:44 +0000
From:   Scott Wood <scott.wood@....com>
To:     Tillmann Heidsieck <theidsieck@...nox.de>
CC:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc: fsl_pci: fix inbound ATMU entries for
 systems with >4G RAM

On 08/26/2016 12:55 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/26/2016 12:26 AM, Tillmann Heidsieck wrote:
>> On 2016-08-24 23:39, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> BTW, for some reason your patch is not showing up in Patchwork.
>>
>> Are there some known pitfalls when sending patches to Patchwork?
> 
> It's not the first time I've seen certain people's patches not show up
> there, but I don't know what the root cause is.

I do see the patch on Patchwork now; I guess it was just slow.

-Scott