[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160826124756.GC28904@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:47:56 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/wait: avoid abort_exclusive_wait() in
__wait_on_bit_lock()
On 08/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> We do not need anything tricky to avoid the race, we can just call
> finish_wait() if action() fails. test_and_set_bit() implies mb() so
> the lockless list_empty_careful() case is fine, we can not miss the
> condition if we race with unlock_page().
To simplify the review see the code with the patch applied:
int __sched
__wait_on_bit_lock(wait_queue_head_t *wq, struct wait_bit_queue *q,
wait_bit_action_f *action, unsigned mode)
{
int ret = 0;
for (;;) {
prepare_to_wait_exclusive(wq, &q->wait, mode);
if (test_bit(q->key.bit_nr, q->key.flags)) {
ret = action(&q->key, mode);
/*
* Ensure that clear_bit() + wake_up() right after
* test_and_set_bit() below can't see us; it should
* wake up another exclusive waiter if we fail.
*/
if (ret)
finish_wait(wq, &q->wait);
}
if (!test_and_set_bit(q->key.bit_nr, q->key.flags)) {
if (!ret)
finish_wait(wq, &q->wait);
return 0;
} else if (ret) {
return ret;
}
}
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists