linux-kernel - [PATCH 6/8] cris-cryptocop: Delete two variables in cryptocop_ioctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f228c0d7-481e-3444-0e61-0c93e8a554e2@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:56:36 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     linux-cris-kernel@...s.com,
        Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
        Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] cris-cryptocop: Delete two variables in
 cryptocop_ioctl_process()

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:40:29 +0200

A zero was assigned to the local variables "cipher_done" and "csum_done"
at one place. But they were not read within this function.
Thus remove them.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
 arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/cryptocop.c | 14 ++++----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/cryptocop.c b/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/cryptocop.c
index cd34723..a682b1f 100644
--- a/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/cryptocop.c
+++ b/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/cryptocop.c
@@ -2497,8 +2497,6 @@ static int cryptocop_ioctl_process(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, unsig
 	int    cipher_active, digest_active, csum_active;
 	int    end_digest, end_csum;
 	int    digest_done = 0;
-	int    cipher_done = 0;
-	int    csum_done = 0;
 
 	DEBUG(printk("cryptocop_ioctl_process\n"));
 
@@ -2794,12 +2792,10 @@ static int cryptocop_ioctl_process(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, unsig
 			dcfgs[dcfg_ix].src = cryptocop_source_dma;
 			cipher_active = 1;
 
-			if (next_ix == (oper.cipher_start + oper.cipher_len)){
-				cipher_done = 1;
+			if (next_ix == (oper.cipher_start + oper.cipher_len))
 				dcfgs[dcfg_ix].last = 1;
-			} else {
+			else
 				dcfgs[dcfg_ix].last = 0;
-			}
 			dcfgs[dcfg_ix].next = descs[desc_ix].cfg;
 			descs[desc_ix].cfg = &dcfgs[dcfg_ix];
 			++dcfg_ix;
@@ -2823,12 +2819,10 @@ static int cryptocop_ioctl_process(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, unsig
 			csum_active = 1;
 			dcfgs[dcfg_ix].tid = CRYPTOCOP_IOCTL_CSUM_TID;
 			dcfgs[dcfg_ix].src = cryptocop_source_dma;
-			if (next_ix == (oper.csum_start + oper.csum_len)){
-				csum_done = 1;
+			if (next_ix == (oper.csum_start + oper.csum_len))
 				dcfgs[dcfg_ix].last = 1;
-			} else {
+			else
 				dcfgs[dcfg_ix].last = 0;
-			}
 			dcfgs[dcfg_ix].next = descs[desc_ix].cfg;
 			descs[desc_ix].cfg = &dcfgs[dcfg_ix];
 			++dcfg_ix;
-- 
2.9.3