lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:28:33 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Simplify __of_clk_get_hw_from_provider() On 08/25, Stephen Boyd wrote: > __of_clk_get_hw_from_provider() is confusing because it will > return EPROBE_DEFER if there isn't a ->get() or ->get_hw() > function pointer in a provider. That's just a bug though, and we > used to NULL pointer exception when ->get() was missing anyway, > so let's make this more obvious that they're not optional. The > assumption is that most providers will implement ->get_hw() so we > only fallback to the ->get() function if necessary. This > clarifies the intent and removes any possibility of probe defer > happening if clk providers are buggy. > > Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> > --- Applied to clk-next -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists