linux-kernel - Re: MAINTAINERS without commits in the last 3 years

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:50:12 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
        Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS without commits in the last 3 years

On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 15:34 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On 08/24/2016 07:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Many email addresses in MAINTAINERS no longer work so many sections in
> > MAINTAINERS could likely be considered either obsolete or unmaintained.
> ...
> > juhlenko@...mai.com
> So I can confirm that he is no longer here, and as far
> as I know is not interested in maintaining this edac driver:
> 
> EDAC-I3000
> M:      Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@...mai.com>
> L:      linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
> S:      Maintained
> F:      drivers/edac/i3000_edac.
> 
> We also no longer have this h/w around, so we don't
> have a way to even test changes really.
> 
> I think we should probably just remove the entry.

Maybe mark it Obsolete or Orphan.

Does anyone, even anyone from Intel, care?