[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+6hz4o_=HQHvRi16VGj04th9Zfcsim0Hj6299WoZfY3-Q2Mvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:49:59 +0800
From: Feng Gao <gfree.wind@...il.com>
To: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
Cc: swhiteho@...hat.com, rpeterso@...hat.com, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 1/1] fs: gfs2: Check if the return value of
rhashtable_walk_start is -EAGAIN
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:18 PM, <fgao@...ai8.com> wrote:
> From: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
>
> When rhashtable_walk_start returns -EAGAIN, it means the resize event
> happened but the iterator still could be used. So it should not be
> treated as an error in gfs2_glock_seq_start.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
> ---
> fs/gfs2/glock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> index 3a90b2b..732721b 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> @@ -1818,7 +1818,7 @@ static void *gfs2_glock_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
> n = (*pos - gi->last_pos);
>
> ret = rhashtable_walk_start(&gi->hti);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret && ret != -EAGAIN)
> return NULL;
>
> do {
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
Sorry, this patch should be generated based on linux-gfs2.git.
I will resubmit it, so this one is superseded.
Regards
Feng.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists