linux-kernel - [PATCH 11/13] tools/perf: Fix the mask in regs_dump__printf and print_sample

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1472418058-28659-12-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Aug 2016 02:30:56 +0530
From:   Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc:     Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
        Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 11/13] tools/perf: Fix the mask in regs_dump__printf and print_sample_iregs

When decoding the perf_regs mask in regs_dump__printf(),
we loop through the mask using find_first_bit and find_next_bit functions.
"mask" is of type "u64", but sent as a "unsigned long *" to
lib functions along with sizeof().

While the exisitng code works fine in most of the case,
the logic is broken when using a 32bit perf on a 64bit kernel (Big Endian).
When reading u64 using (u32 *)(&val)[0], perf (lib/find_*_bit()) assumes it gets
lower 32bits of u64 which is wrong. Proposed fix is to swap the words
of the u64 to handle this case. This is _not_ endianess swap.

Suggested-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Fix already posted, but yet to be pulled in. This is needed
for the subsequent patches.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9285421/

 tools/include/linux/bitmap.h |  2 ++
 tools/lib/bitmap.c           | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/builtin-script.c  |  4 +++-
 tools/perf/util/session.c    |  4 +++-
 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/include/linux/bitmap.h b/tools/include/linux/bitmap.h
index 43c1c5021e4b..998ac95a8ddd 100644
--- a/tools/include/linux/bitmap.h
+++ b/tools/include/linux/bitmap.h
@@ -4,10 +4,12 @@
 #include <string.h>
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
+#include <limits.h>
 
 #define DECLARE_BITMAP(name,bits) \
 	unsigned long name[BITS_TO_LONGS(bits)]
 
+void bitmap_from_u64(unsigned long *dst, u64 mask);
 int __bitmap_weight(const unsigned long *bitmap, int bits);
 void __bitmap_or(unsigned long *dst, const unsigned long *bitmap1,
 		 const unsigned long *bitmap2, int bits);
diff --git a/tools/lib/bitmap.c b/tools/lib/bitmap.c
index 38748b0e342f..21e17730c35f 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bitmap.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bitmap.c
@@ -73,3 +73,21 @@ int __bitmap_and(unsigned long *dst, const unsigned long *bitmap1,
 			   BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(bits));
 	return result != 0;
 }
+
+/*
+ * bitmap_from_u64 - Check and swap words within u64.
+ *  @mask: source bitmap
+ *  @dst:  destination bitmap
+ *
+ * In 32 bit big endian userspace on a 64bit kernel, 'unsigned long' is 32 bits.
+ * When reading u64 using (u32 *)(&val)[0] and (u32 *)(&val)[1],
+ * we will get wrong value for the mask. That is "(u32 *)(&val)[0]"
+ * gets upper 32 bits of u64, but perf may expect lower 32bits of u64.
+ */
+void bitmap_from_u64(unsigned long *dst, u64 mask)
+{
+	dst[0] = mask & ULONG_MAX;
+
+	if (sizeof(mask) > sizeof(unsigned long))
+		dst[1] = mask >> 32;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
index 6b3c8b0d3276..db270b4f892a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
@@ -421,11 +421,13 @@ static void print_sample_iregs(struct perf_sample *sample,
 	struct regs_dump *regs = &sample->intr_regs;
 	uint64_t mask = attr->sample_regs_intr;
 	unsigned i = 0, r;
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(_mask, 64);
 
 	if (!regs)
 		return;
 
-	for_each_set_bit(r, (unsigned long *) &mask, sizeof(mask) * 8) {
+	bitmap_from_u64(_mask, mask);
+	for_each_set_bit(r, _mask, sizeof(mask) * 8) {
 		u64 val = regs->regs[i++];
 		printf("%5s:0x%"PRIx64" ", perf_reg_name(r), val);
 	}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
index 5d61242a6e64..440a9fb2a6fb 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
@@ -944,8 +944,10 @@ static void branch_stack__printf(struct perf_sample *sample)
 static void regs_dump__printf(u64 mask, u64 *regs)
 {
 	unsigned rid, i = 0;
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(_mask, 64);
 
-	for_each_set_bit(rid, (unsigned long *) &mask, sizeof(mask) * 8) {
+	bitmap_from_u64(_mask, mask);
+	for_each_set_bit(rid, _mask, sizeof(mask) * 8) {
 		u64 val = regs[i++];
 
 		printf(".... %-5s 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
-- 
2.7.4