[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D44BDF11-B00F-40F3-9446-7E5228C00A6B@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:34:11 +0800
From: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@...hat.com>
To: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@....org>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Ceph Development <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ceph: do not modify fi->frag in need_reset_readdir()
> On Aug 29, 2016, at 00:47, Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@....org> wrote:
>
> Commit f3c4ebe65ea1 ("ceph: using hash value to compose dentry offset")
> modified "if (fpos_frag(new_pos) != fi->frag)" to "if (fi->frag |=
> fpos_frag(new_pos))" in need_reset_readdir(), thus replacing a
> comparison operator with an assignment one.
>
> This looks like a typo which is reported by clang when building the
> kernel with some warning flags:
>
> fs/ceph/dir.c:600:22: error: using the result of an assignment as a
> condition without parentheses [-Werror,-Wparentheses]
> } else if (fi->frag |= fpos_frag(new_pos)) {
> ~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> fs/ceph/dir.c:600:22: note: place parentheses around the assignment
> to silence this warning
> } else if (fi->frag |= fpos_frag(new_pos)) {
> ^
> ( )
> fs/ceph/dir.c:600:22: note: use '!=' to turn this compound
> assignment into an inequality comparison
> } else if (fi->frag |= fpos_frag(new_pos)) {
> ^~
> !=
>
> Fixes: f3c4ebe65ea1 ("ceph: using hash value to compose dentry offset")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.7.x
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@....org>
> ---
> fs/ceph/dir.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/dir.c b/fs/ceph/dir.c
> index c64a0b794d49..df4b3e6fa563 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/dir.c
> @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static bool need_reset_readdir(struct ceph_file_info *fi, loff_t new_pos)
> if (is_hash_order(new_pos)) {
> /* no need to reset last_name for a forward seek when
> * dentries are sotred in hash order */
> - } else if (fi->frag |= fpos_frag(new_pos)) {
> + } else if (fi->frag != fpos_frag(new_pos)) {
> return true;
> }
> rinfo = fi->last_readdir ? &fi->last_readdir->r_reply_info : NULL;
Applied, thanks
Yan, Zheng
> --
> 2.9.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists