lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 29 Aug 2016 13:57:41 +0200
From:   walter harms <wharms@....de>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Use kmalloc_array() in three functions



Am 29.08.2016 11:47, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> 
> 
> On 25/08/2016 10:22, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/led.c
>> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/led.c
>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static ssize_t led_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
>>  	if (count > LED_MAX_LENGTH)
>>  		count = LED_MAX_LENGTH;
>>  
>> -	buf = kmalloc(sizeof(char) * (count + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	buf = kmalloc_array(count + 1, sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
>>  	if (!buf)
>>  		return -ENOMEM;
>>  
> 
> Here it's probably best to just remove sizeof(char) completely, as it's
> 1 by definition.
> 
> Paolo


I would not do so, if you ever change buf to something else it would break,
having a sizeof(*buf) here is harmless and a known pattern.

re,
 wh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ