[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160829111045.GB3736@b29397-desktop>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:10:45 +0800
From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>
To: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
broonie@...nel.org, sre@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
dbaryshkov@...il.com, dwmw3@...radead.org, mark.rutland@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, k.kozlowski@...sung.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, oscar@...andei.net, pawel.moll@....com,
arnd@...db.de, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, festevam@...il.com,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, stephen.boyd@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com,
stillcompiling@...il.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
mail@...iej.szmigiero.name, mka@...omium.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] power: add power sequence library
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:53:35PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:02:48PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Monday 15 August 2016 02:43 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >This is a follow-up for my last power sequence framework patch set [1].
> > >According to Rob Herring and Ulf Hansson's comments[2], I use a generic
> > >power sequence library for parsing the power sequence elements on DT,
> > >and implement generic power sequence on library. The host driver
> > >can allocate power sequence instance, and calls pwrseq APIs accordingly.
> > >
> > >In future, if there are special power sequence requirements, the special
> > >power sequence library can be created.
> > >
> > >This patch set is tested on i.mx6 sabresx evk using a dts change, I use
> > >two hot-plug devices to simulate this use case, the related binding
> > >change is updated at patch [1/6], The udoo board changes were tested
> > >using my last power sequence patch set.[3]
> > >
> > >Except for hard-wired MMC and USB devices, I find the USB ULPI PHY also
> > >need to power on itself before it can be found by ULPI bus.
> > >
> > >[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg142755.html
> > >[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg143106.html
> > >[3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg142815.html
> > (Please ignore my response on V2)
> >
> > Sorry being so late in the discussion...
> >
> > If I am not missing anything, then I am afraid to say that the
> > generic library
> > implementation in this patch series is not going to solve many of
> > the custom
> > requirement of power on, off, etc...
> > I know you mentioned about adding another library when we come
> > across such platforms, but should we not keep provision (or easy
> > hooks/path)
> > to enable that ?
> >
> > Let me bring in the use case I am dealing with,
> >
> >
> > Host
> > |
> > V
> > USB port
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > |
> > V
> > USB HUB device (May need custom on/off seq)
> > |
> > V
> > =============================
> > | |
> > V V
> > Device-1 Device-2
> > (Needs special power (Needs special power
> > on/off sequence. on/off sequence.
> > Also may need custom Also, may need custom
> > sequence for sequence for
> > suspend/resume) suspend/resume)
> >
> >
> > Note: Both Devices are connected to HUB via HSIC and may differ
> > in terms of functionality, features they support.
> >
> > In the above case, both Device-1 and Device-2, need separate
> > power on/off sequence. So generic library currently we have in this
> > patch series is not going to satisfy the need here.
> >
> > I looked at all 6 revisions of this patch-series, went through the
> > review comments, and looked at MMC power sequence code;
> > what I can say here is, we need something similar to
> > MMC power sequence here, where every device can have its own
> > power sequence (if needed).
> >
> > I know Rob is not in favor of creating platform device for
> > this, and I understand his comment.
> > If not platform device, but atleast we need mechanism to
> > connect each device back to its of_node and its respective
> > driver/library fns. For example, the Devices may support different
> > boot modes, and platform driver needs to make sure that
> > the right sequence is followed for booting.
> >
> > Peter, My apologies for taking you back again on this series.
> > I am OK, if you wish to address this in incremental addition,
> > but my point is, we know that the current generic way is not
> > enough for us, so I think we should try to fix it in initial phase only.
> >
>
> Rob, it seems generic power sequence can't cover all cases.
> Without information from DT, we can't know which power sequence
> for which device.
>
Vaibhav, do you agree that I create pwrseq library list using postcore_initcall
for each library, and choose pwrseq library according to compatible
string first, if there is no compatible string for this library, just
use generic pwrseq library.
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists