[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1472477669-27508-5-git-send-email-manfred@colorfullife.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:34:29 +0200
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 1vier1@....de,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4 V4] qspinlock for x86: smp_mb__after_spin_lock() is free
For x86 qspinlocks, no additional memory barrier is required in
smp_mb__after_spin_lock:
Theoretically, for qspinlock we could define two barriers:
- smp_mb__after_spin_lock: Free for x86, not free for powerpc
- smp_mb__between_spin_lock_and_spin_unlock_wait():
Free for all archs, see queued_spin_unlock_wait for details.
As smp_mb__between_spin_lock_and_spin_unlock_wait() is not used
in any hotpaths, the patch does not create that define yet.
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
index eaba080..04d26ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
@@ -61,6 +61,17 @@ static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT */
+#ifndef smp_mb__after_spin_lock
+/**
+ * smp_mb__after_spin_lock() - Provide smp_mb() after spin_lock
+ *
+ * queued_spin_lock() provides full memory barriers semantics,
+ * thus no further memory barrier is required. See
+ * queued_spin_unlock_wait() for further details.
+ */
+#define smp_mb__after_spin_lock() do { } while (0)
+#endif
+
#include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h>
#endif /* _ASM_X86_QSPINLOCK_H */
--
2.5.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists