[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1472447255-10584-2-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:07:30 +0900
From: js1304@...il.com
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/6] mm/page_alloc: don't reserve ZONE_HIGHMEM for ZONE_MOVABLE request
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Freepage on ZONE_HIGHMEM doesn't work for kernel memory so it's not that
important to reserve. When ZONE_MOVABLE is used, this problem would
theorectically cause to decrease usable memory for GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE
allocation request which is mainly used for page cache and anon page
allocation. So, fix it.
And, defining sysctl_lowmem_reserve_ratio array by MAX_NR_ZONES - 1 size
makes code complex. For example, if there is highmem system, following
reserve ratio is activated for *NORMAL ZONE* which would be easyily
misleading people.
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
32
#endif
This patch also fix this situation by defining sysctl_lowmem_reserve_ratio
array by MAX_NR_ZONES and place "#ifdef" to right place.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
---
include/linux/mmzone.h | 2 +-
mm/page_alloc.c | 7 ++++---
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index d572b78..e3f39af 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ int min_free_kbytes_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *, int,
void __user *, size_t *, loff_t *);
int watermark_scale_factor_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *, int,
void __user *, size_t *, loff_t *);
-extern int sysctl_lowmem_reserve_ratio[MAX_NR_ZONES-1];
+extern int sysctl_lowmem_reserve_ratio[MAX_NR_ZONES];
int lowmem_reserve_ratio_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *, int,
void __user *, size_t *, loff_t *);
int percpu_pagelist_fraction_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *, int,
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 4f7d5d7..a8310de 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -198,17 +198,18 @@ static void __free_pages_ok(struct page *page, unsigned int order);
* TBD: should special case ZONE_DMA32 machines here - in those we normally
* don't need any ZONE_NORMAL reservation
*/
-int sysctl_lowmem_reserve_ratio[MAX_NR_ZONES-1] = {
+int sysctl_lowmem_reserve_ratio[MAX_NR_ZONES] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
256,
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
256,
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
32,
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
+ INT_MAX,
#endif
- 32,
+ INT_MAX,
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL(totalram_pages);
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists