[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160829124313.54c2e379@t450s.home>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 12:43:13 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Wei Jiangang <weijg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
<mark.d.rustad@...el.com>, <aik@...abs.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/pci: Fix typos in comments
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:37:05 +0800
Wei Jiangang <weijg.fnst@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wei Jiangang <weijg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> index 688691d9058d..c4f235452d81 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static const u8 pci_cap_length[PCI_CAP_ID_MAX + 1] = {
>
> /*
> * Lengths of PCIe/PCI-X Extended Config Capabilities
> - * 0: Removed or masked from the user visible capabilty list
> + * 0: Removed or masked from the user visible capability list
> * FF: Variable length
> */
> static const u16 pci_ext_cap_length[PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX + 1] = {
> @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static int alloc_perm_bits(struct perm_bits *perm, int size)
> * ignore whether a read/write exceeds the defined capability
> * structure. We can do this because:
> * - Standard config space is already dword aligned
> - * - Capabilities are all dword alinged (bits 0:1 of next reserved)
> + * - Capabilities are all dword aligned (bits 0:1 of next reserved)
> * - Express capabilities defined as dword aligned
> */
> size = round_up(size, 4);
> @@ -1516,10 +1516,10 @@ static int vfio_ecap_init(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
> * space which tracks reads and writes to bits that we emulate for
> * the user. Initial values filled from device.
> *
> - * Using shared stuct perm_bits between all vfio-pci devices saves
> + * Using shared struct perm_bits between all vfio-pci devices saves
> * us from allocating cfg_size buffers for virt and write for every
> * device. We could remove vconfig and allocate individual buffers
> - * for each area requring emulated bits, but the array of pointers
> + * for each area requiring emulated bits, but the array of pointers
> * would be comparable in size (at least for standard config space).
> */
> int vfio_config_init(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
Applied to next branch for v4.9. Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists