linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v05 69/72] uapi rose.h: glibc netrose/rose.h header file compatibility fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Aug 2016 12:34:25 -0700
From:   David Ranch <linux-hams@...nnet.net>
To:     Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@....fi>, walter harms <wharms@....de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v05 69/72] uapi rose.h: glibc netrose/rose.h header file
 compatibility fixes


Hello Mikko,

Somewhat related, the ax25.h file from libax25-devel also has conflicts 
with the Glibc's ax.25.h.  This creates trouble so if we could get a fix 
for that, that would be appreciated as well though it might be a Glibc 
issue and not a kernel issue.

--David



On 08/27/2016 10:59 PM, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 05:38:00PM +0200, walter harms wrote:
>> perhaps this not tested snipped would make sure that
>> you have included linux/rose.h ?
>>
>> #ifndef ROSE_KERNEL_H
>> #include <linux/rose.h>
>> #endif
>>
>> #include <netrose/rose.h>
> Sorry, I did not quite get this.
>
> <linux/rose.h> has conflicting definitions with glibc <netrose/rose.h>.
> The patches fixes the uapi headers <linux/rose.h> so that it hides
> definitions if <netrose/rose.h> from glibc was already included.
>
> -Mikko
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html