lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:41:28 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:     Christopher Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>
cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] livepatch: add load/unload hooks to objects

On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Christopher Arges wrote:

> Another example is CVE-2016-2117. Here we need to unset NETIF_F_SG on a 
> particular device. If the device is already loaded we need a way to 
> fixup hw_features on an already allocated network device. Again this 
> could be done in the init code of the patch, but a nicer solution would 
> be to do this on a load/unload hook appropriately.

I am afraid this is more complicated than what you describe. You can't 
just unset NETIF_F_SG and be done with it; look for example what might 
happen if you clear the flag while skb_segment() is running and gcc is 
refetching netdev_features_t (there is no READ_ONCE() for that). The same 
holds for __ip6_append_data().
I am not saying this can't be worked around, but it's way much more 
complicated than just clearing a bit in a callback.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ