linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] mm/cma: introduce new zone, ZONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:05:20 +0530
From:   "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     js1304@...il.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] mm/cma: introduce new zone, ZONE_CMA


....

>  static inline void check_highest_zone(enum zone_type k)
>  {
> -	if (k > policy_zone && k != ZONE_MOVABLE)
> +	if (k > policy_zone && k != ZONE_MOVABLE && !is_zone_cma_idx(k))
>  		policy_zone = k;
>  }
>


Should we apply policy to allocation from ZONE CMA ?. CMA reserve
happens early and may mostly come from one node. Do we want the
CMA allocation to fail if we use mbind(MPOL_BIND) with a node mask not
including that node on which CMA is reserved, considering CMA memory is
going to be used for special purpose.

-aneesh