[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160830154641.GD4554@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:46:41 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] nmi_backtrace: generate one-line reports for idle
cpus
On Mon 2016-08-29 12:12:49, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> When doing an nmi backtrace of many cores, most of which are idle,
> the output is a little overwhelming and very uninformative. Suppress
> messages for cpus that are idling when they are interrupted and just
> emit one line, "NMI backtrace for N skipped: idling at pc 0xNNN".
>
> We do this by grouping all the cpuidle code together into a new
> .cpuidle.text section, and then checking the address of the
> interrupted PC to see if it lies within that section.
>
> This commit suitably tags x86 and tile idle routines, and only
> adds in the minimal framework for other architectures.
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Tested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Tested-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org> [arm]
> Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
This version works even with my configuration. Feel free to
add
Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists