linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv6 1/3] usb: USB Type-C connector class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160830170035.GA29255@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:00:35 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bin Gao <bin.gao@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 1/3] usb: USB Type-C connector class

Heikki,

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:22:27AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> 
> How about if I add the "supports_usb_power_delivery" attribute for the
> partners instead to give some details about them. Any objections?
> 
After looking into the code again, I assume the idea is to have the existing
supports_usb_power_delivery attribute report if the local port supports the
PD, and to have the partner attribute report if the partner supports the PD
protocol. In other words, it would report the value of usb_pd in struct
typec_partner.

If so, I am ok with it. You might actually consider adding the same attribute
to the cable attributes as well.

Thanks,
Guenter