linux-kernel - Re: DAX can not work on virtual nvdimm device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hrFSxNcmmVLVZT4fK3+hspPCDKW0rVBj1=3GkJRgZ29Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:09:01 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
        Yumei Huang <yuhuang@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        "qemu-devel@...gnu.org" <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: DAX can not work on virtual nvdimm device

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Xiao Guangrong
<guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/30/2016 03:30 AM, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>
>>
>> Can you please verify that you are using "usable" memory for your memmap?
>> All
>> the details are here:
>>
>>
>> https://nvdimm.wiki.kernel.org/how_to_choose_the_correct_memmap_kernel_parameter_for_pmem_on_your_system
>
>
> Sure.
>
> This is the BIOS E820 info in the guest:
>
> e820: BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009fbff] usable
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009fc00-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000f0000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x00000000bffdefff] usable
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000bffdf000-0x00000000bfffffff] reserved
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000feffc000-0x00000000feffffff] reserved
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fffc0000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x000000083fffffff] usable
> NX (Execute Disable) protection: active
> e820: user-defined physical RAM map:
> user: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009fbff] usable
> user: [mem 0x000000000009fc00-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
> user: [mem 0x00000000000f0000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
> user: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x00000000bffdefff] usable
> user: [mem 0x00000000bffdf000-0x00000000bfffffff] reserved
> user: [mem 0x00000000feffc000-0x00000000feffffff] reserved
> user: [mem 0x00000000fffc0000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
> user: [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x000000027fffffff] usable
> user: [mem 0x0000000280000000-0x00000003ffffffff] persistent (type 12)
> user: [mem 0x0000000400000000-0x000000083fffffff] usable
>
> So that the memory we used to emulate PMEM split the 'usable' region.
>
>>
>> My guess is that Boaz was correct, and that your memmap is off using
>> addresses
>> that don't actually map to memory.
>
>
> I do not think so. :(
>
> I did mmap-write and mmap-read test, the data written by mmap-write can be
> correctly read out, so that the backend memory is really existing.
>

Can you post your exact reproduction steps?  This test is not failing for me.