linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm/perf: Fix pmu percpu irq handling at hotplug.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:32:25 +0100
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     Yabin Cui <yabinc@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm/perf: Fix pmu percpu irq handling at hotplug.

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:48:00AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:25:14PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 01:24:38PM -0700, Yabin Cui wrote:
> > >    If the cpu pmu is using a percpu irq:                                    
> > >          
> > >    1. When a cpu is down, we should disable pmu irq on                      
> > >    that cpu. Otherwise, if the cpu is still down when                        
> > >    the last perf event is released, the pmu irq can't                        
> > >    be freed. Because the irq is still enabled on the                        
> > >    offlined cpu. And following perf_event_open()                            
> > >    syscalls will fail.                                                      
> > >
> > >    2. When a cpu is up, we should enable pmu irq on                          
> > >    that cpu. Otherwise, profiling tools can't sample                        
> > >    events on the cpu before all perf events are                              
> > >    released, because pmu irq is disabled on that cpu.                        

[...]

> > Rather than adding more moving parts to the IRQ manipulation logic, I'd
> > rather we rework the IRQ manipulation logic to:
> > 
> > * At probe time, request all the interrupts. If we can't, bail out and
> >   fail the probe.
> > 
> > * Upon hotplug in (and at probe time), configure the affinity and
> >   enable the relevant interrupt(s).
> > 
> > * Upon hotplug out, disable the relevant interrupt.

> > I'm taking a look at doing the above, but I don't yet have a patch.
> 
> Any update on this? I'd quite like to do *something* to fix the issues
> reported here.

Apologies for the delay.

I've been away from my development hardware for the last week, so I
ahven't fought with this for a few days.

Given it's requiring that I practically rewrite of_pmu_irq_cfg and
friends, it may be better to take Yabin's patch for the timebeing if you
want a quick fix for this particular issue.

Thanks,
Mark.