[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzVnBqtk5Az3VNMQ=HfTUBSYyOVejHykU2c63K70s24=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:23:36 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: more robust allocation failure handling in nfsd_reply_cache_init
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> While this would be good to get in, I don't see any particular urgency
> here. This seems like it'd be reasonable for v4.9.
Agreed, looks ok to me. It certainly does not look like a new
regression or like a serious problem issue in practice. So 4.9 sounds
appropriate.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists