[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJEcRgosrA+q9u6NMNJGR5XCA+Gy-SEMc51GcOry6URcoB4NJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:42:31 +0300
From: moshe green <mgmoshes@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] staging: sm750fb: fix block comment style issues in ddk750_chip.c
Will do.
Thanks
On 30 August 2016 at 22:19, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 22:05 +0300, Moshe Green wrote:
>> Fix block comment * prefix and trailing */ warnings found
>> by the checkpatch.pl tool in ddk750_chip.c.
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
> []
>> @@ -320,8 +320,10 @@ unsigned int calcPllValue(unsigned int request_orig, pll_value_t *pll)
>> int max_d = 6;
>>
>> if (getChipType() == SM750LE) {
>> - /* SM750LE don't have prgrammable PLL and M/N values to work on.
>> - Just return the requested clock. */
>> + /* SM750LE don't have
>> + * prgrammable PLL and M/N values to work on
>
> Might as well fix the programmable typo too.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists