linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/syscalls: allow multiple syscall numbers per syscall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160830165830.5e494c43@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:58:30 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:     Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@...tec.com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/syscalls: allow multiple syscall numbers
 per syscall

On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:53:53 -0700
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:


> Egads!  OK, I see why this is a mess.

:-)

> 
> I guess we should be creating the metadata from the syscall tables
> instead of from the syscall definitions, but I guess that's currently
> a nasty per-arch mess.

Yep.

> 
> Could we at least have an array of (arch, nr) instead of just an array
> of nrs in the metadata?

I guess I'm not following you on what would be used for "arch".

-- Steve