[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160830150315.93efc592aa631f474af760b5@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:03:15 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk/nmi: avoid direct printk()-s from
__printk_nmi_flush()
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 01:13:54 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:
> __printk_nmi_flush() can be called from nmi_panic(), therefore it has to
> test whether it's executed in NMI context and thus must route the messages
> through deferred printk() or via direct printk().
Why? What misbehaviour does the current code cause?
> Except for two places
> where __printk_nmi_flush() does unconditional direct printk() calls:
> - pr_err("printk_nmi_flush: internal error ...")
> - pr_cont("\n")
>
> Factor out print_nmi_seq_line() parts into a new printk_nmi_flush_line()
> function, which takes care of in_nmi(), and use it in __printk_nmi_flush()
> for printing and error-reporting.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists