linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/6] time: Avoid undefined behaviour in timespec64_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1472680222-21060-5-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2016 14:50:20 -0700
From:   John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] time: Avoid undefined behaviour in timespec64_add_safe()

From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>

I ran into this:

    ================================================================================
    UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in kernel/time/time.c:783:2
    signed integer overflow:
    5273 + 9223372036854771711 cannot be represented in type 'long int'
    CPU: 0 PID: 17363 Comm: trinity-c0 Not tainted 4.8.0-rc1+ #88
    Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.3-0-ge2fc41e-prebuilt.qemu-project.org
    04/01/2014
     0000000000000000 ffff88011457f8f0 ffffffff82344f50 0000000041b58ab3
     ffffffff84f98080 ffffffff82344ea4 ffff88011457f918 ffff88011457f8c8
     ffff88011457f8e0 7fffffffffffefff ffff88011457f6d8 dffffc0000000000
    Call Trace:
     [<ffffffff82344f50>] dump_stack+0xac/0xfc
     [<ffffffff82344ea4>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0xc4/0xc4
     [<ffffffff8242f4c8>] ubsan_epilogue+0xd/0x8a
     [<ffffffff8242fc04>] handle_overflow+0x202/0x23d
     [<ffffffff8242fa02>] ? val_to_string.constprop.6+0x11e/0x11e
     [<ffffffff823c7837>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
     [<ffffffff8131b581>] ? __sigqueue_free.part.13+0x51/0x70
     [<ffffffff8146d4e0>] ? rcu_is_watching+0x110/0x110
     [<ffffffff8242fc4d>] __ubsan_handle_add_overflow+0xe/0x10
     [<ffffffff81476ef8>] timespec64_add_safe+0x298/0x340
     [<ffffffff81476c60>] ? timespec_add_safe+0x330/0x330
     [<ffffffff812f7990>] ? wait_noreap_copyout+0x1d0/0x1d0
     [<ffffffff8184bf18>] poll_select_set_timeout+0xf8/0x170
     [<ffffffff8184be20>] ? poll_schedule_timeout+0x2b0/0x2b0
     [<ffffffff813aa9bb>] ? __might_sleep+0x5b/0x260
     [<ffffffff833c8a87>] __sys_recvmmsg+0x107/0x790
     [<ffffffff833c8980>] ? SyS_recvmsg+0x20/0x20
     [<ffffffff81486378>] ? hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x3b8/0x1380
     [<ffffffff845f8bfb>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3b/0x60
     [<ffffffff8148bcea>] ? do_setitimer+0x39a/0x8e0
     [<ffffffff813aa9bb>] ? __might_sleep+0x5b/0x260
     [<ffffffff833c9110>] ? __sys_recvmmsg+0x790/0x790
     [<ffffffff833c91e9>] SyS_recvmmsg+0xd9/0x160
     [<ffffffff833c9110>] ? __sys_recvmmsg+0x790/0x790
     [<ffffffff823c7853>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
     [<ffffffff8162f680>] ? __context_tracking_exit.part.3+0x30/0x1b0
     [<ffffffff833c9110>] ? __sys_recvmmsg+0x790/0x790
     [<ffffffff81007bd3>] do_syscall_64+0x1b3/0x4b0
     [<ffffffff845f936a>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
    ================================================================================

Line 783 is this:

783         set_normalized_timespec64(&res, lhs.tv_sec + rhs.tv_sec,
784                         lhs.tv_nsec + rhs.tv_nsec);

In other words, since lhs.tv_sec and rhs.tv_sec are both time64_t, this
is a signed addition which will cause undefined behaviour on overflow.

Note that this is not currently a huge concern since the kernel should be
built with -fno-strict-overflow by default, but could be a problem in the
future, a problem with older compilers, or other compilers than gcc.

The easiest way to avoid the overflow is to cast one of the arguments to
unsigned (so the addition will be done using unsigned arithmetic).

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
---
 include/linux/time64.h | 1 +
 kernel/time/time.c     | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/time64.h b/include/linux/time64.h
index 7e5d2fa..980c71b 100644
--- a/include/linux/time64.h
+++ b/include/linux/time64.h
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 #include <linux/math64.h>
 
 typedef __s64 time64_t;
+typedef __u64 timeu64_t;
 
 /*
  * This wants to go into uapi/linux/time.h once we agreed about the
diff --git a/kernel/time/time.c b/kernel/time/time.c
index 667b933..bd62fb8 100644
--- a/kernel/time/time.c
+++ b/kernel/time/time.c
@@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ struct timespec64 timespec64_add_safe(const struct timespec64 lhs,
 {
 	struct timespec64 res;
 
-	set_normalized_timespec64(&res, lhs.tv_sec + rhs.tv_sec,
+	set_normalized_timespec64(&res, (timeu64_t) lhs.tv_sec + rhs.tv_sec,
 			lhs.tv_nsec + rhs.tv_nsec);
 
 	if (unlikely(res.tv_sec < lhs.tv_sec || res.tv_sec < rhs.tv_sec)) {
-- 
1.9.1