[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1472682450.14381.364.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:27:30 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job
On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 23:51 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> The result from this run were handling 1,517,248 pps, without any
> drops, all processes pinned to the same CPU.
>
> $ nstat > /dev/null && sleep 1 && nstat
> #kernel
> IpInReceives 1517225 0.0
> IpInDelivers 1517224 0.0
> UdpInDatagrams 1517248 0.0
> IpExtInOctets 69793408 0.0
> IpExtInNoECTPkts 1517246 0.0
>
> I'm acking this patch:
>
> Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
>
Thanks a lot for bringing back the issue to me again, and all your
tests !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists