[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160831233811.g6kf24fdhnfhn637@arbab-vm>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:38:12 -0500
From: Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>,
Andrew Banman <abanman@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] memory-hotplug: fix store_mem_state() return
value
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:06:14PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
>The correct fix is for store_mem_state() to return -EINVAL when
>device_online() returns non-zero.
Let me put it to you this way--which one of these sysfs operations is
behaving correctly?
# cd /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0
# cat online
1
# echo 1 > online; echo $?
0
or
# cd /sys/devices/system/memory/memory0
# cat state
online
# echo online > state; echo $?
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
1
One of them should change to match the other.
--
Reza Arbab
Powered by blists - more mailing lists