[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57C6B572.80106@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:46:10 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
To: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency
consideration
Hi,
Is there any concern on this patch?
Regards
Alex
On 08/25/2016 04:42 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> Kernel or user may have special requirement on cpu response time, like
> if a interrupt is pinned to a cpu, we don't want the cpu goes too deep
> sleep. This patch can prevent this thing happen by consider per cpu
> resume_latency setting in cpu sleep state selection in menu governor.
>
> The pm_qos_resume_latency ask device to give reponse in this time. That's
> similar with cpu cstates' entry_latency + exit_latency. But since
> most of cpu cstate either has no entry_latency or add it into exit_latency
> So, we just can restrict this time requirement as states exit_latency.
>
> The 0 value of pm_qos_resume_latency is for no limitation according ABI
> definition. So set the value 1 could get the 0 latency if it's needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> index bb58e2a..e354880 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/cpuidle.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/pm_qos.h>
> #include <linux/time.h>
> #include <linux/ktime.h>
> @@ -281,17 +282,23 @@ again:
> static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> {
> struct menu_device *data = this_cpu_ptr(&menu_devices);
> + struct device *device = get_cpu_device(dev->cpu);
> int latency_req = pm_qos_request(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY);
> int i;
> unsigned int interactivity_req;
> unsigned int expected_interval;
> unsigned long nr_iowaiters, cpu_load;
> + int resume_latency = dev_pm_qos_read_value(device);
>
> if (data->needs_update) {
> menu_update(drv, dev);
> data->needs_update = 0;
> }
>
> + /* resume_latency is 0 means no restriction */
> + if (resume_latency && resume_latency < latency_req)
> + latency_req = resume_latency;
> +
> /* Special case when user has set very strict latency requirement */
> if (unlikely(latency_req == 0))
> return 0;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists