linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] char: rpmb: provide a user space interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160831104955.GA10180@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:49:55 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        "Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
        Michael Ryleev <gmar@...gle.com>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@...eaurora.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] char: rpmb: provide a user space interface

On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 09:44:03AM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon 2016-07-18 23:27:49, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > The user space API is achieved via two synchronous IOCTL.
> > 
> > IOCTLs?
> 
> Will fix
>  
> > > Simplified one, RPMB_IOC_REQ_CMD, were read result cycles is
> > performed
> > > by the framework on behalf the user and second, RPMB_IOC_SEQ_CMD
> > where
> > > the whole RPMB sequence including RESULT_READ is supplied by the caller.
> > > The latter is intended for  easier adjusting  of the  applications
> > > that use MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD ioctl.
> > 
> > Why "  "?
> Not sure I there is enough clue in your question. 
> > 
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> > 
> > > +
> > > +static long rpmb_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned
> > > +long arg) {
> > > +	return __rpmb_ioctl(fp, cmd, (void __user *)arg); }
> > > +
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > > +static long rpmb_compat_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd,
> > > +			      unsigned long arg)
> > > +{
> > > +	return	__rpmb_ioctl(fp, cmd, compat_ptr(arg));
> > > +}
> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
> > 
> > Description of the ioctl is missing, 
> Will add. 
> 
> and it should certainly be designed in a way
> > that it does not need compat support.
> 
> The compat_ioctl handler just casts the compat_ptr, I believe this
> should be done unless the ioctl is globaly registered in
> fs/compat_ioctl.c, but I might be wrong.

You shouldn't need a compat ioctl for anything new that is added, unless
your api is really messed up.  Please test to be sure, and not use a
compat ioctl at all, it isn't that hard to do.

thanks,

greg k-h