linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] mfd: altera-a10sr: make it explicitly non-modular

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160831114323.GA8649@dell>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:43:23 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thor Thayer <tthayer@...nsource.altera.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mfd: altera-a10sr: make it explicitly non-modular

On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Paul Gortmaker wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Jul 2016, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >
> >> The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
> >>
> >> drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_ALTERA_A10SR
> >> drivers/mfd/Kconfig:    bool "Altera Arria10 DevKit System Resource chip"
> >>
> >> ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
> >>
> >> Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that
> >> when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
> >>
> 
> [...]
> 
> >>
> >> Cc: Thor Thayer <tthayer@...nsource.altera.com>
> >> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/mfd/altera-a10sr.c | 14 ++++++--------
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > Applied, thanks.
> 
> Hi Lee,
> 
> I never did see this applied copy of the patch loop around via linux-next
> and conflict with my local copy of the same patch.  Same for 3,4,5,6 of
> the same series (patch #2 was not applied; it was dropped in favour of
> a redo as a tristate conversion.)
> 
> Just wanting to double check I didn't mess something up that caused them
> to get silently dropped after the fact, before I prepare to send any additional
> mfd patches to be considered for your 4.9 content queue.

It's been dropped.  Make your subsequent changes.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog