[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a78d4df0-3d8b-2a4b-a129-3d489433b570@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 06:41:44 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@...gle.com>,
Rom Lemarchand <romlem@...gle.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [v2] locking/percpu-rwsem: Optimize readers and reduce global
impact
On 08/31/2016 01:09 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:21:02PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Peter,
>>
>> The call to rcu_sync_is_idle() causes the following build error when building
>> x86_64:allmodconfig.
>>
>> ERROR: "rcu_sync_lockdep_assert" [kernel/locking/locktorture.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "rcu_sync_lockdep_assert" [fs/ext4/ext4.ko] undefined!
>>
>> I think this was also reported by the 0-day build bot.
>>
>> The simple fix would of course be to export rcu_sync_lockdep_assert. Before I
>> apply that change to the Android code (where the patch has been aplied and
>> the problem is seen) - do you by any chance have a better solution in mind ?
>
> Nope, that's exactly what Ingo did when he ran into this. If you look at
> commit 80127a39681b ("locking/percpu-rwsem: Optimize readers and reduce
> global impact"), you'll notice the last hunk:
>
Ah, I missed that, and didn't realize that it is already upstream. Thanks a lot!
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists