lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160831134943.GB15078@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:49:43 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: make switchdev DB ops
 generic

Hi Vivien

> -static int _mv88e6xxx_port_fdb_dump_one(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
> -					u16 fid, u16 vid, int port,
> -					struct switchdev_obj_port_fdb *fdb,
> -					int (*cb)(struct switchdev_obj *obj))
> +static int mv88e6xxx_port_db_dump_one(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
> +				      u16 fid, u16 vid, int port,
> +				      struct switchdev_obj *obj,
> +				      int (*cb)(struct switchdev_obj *obj))
>  {
>  	struct mv88e6xxx_atu_entry addr = {
>  		.mac = { 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff },
> @@ -2222,72 +2219,87 @@ static int _mv88e6xxx_port_fdb_dump_one(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
>  	do {
>  		err = _mv88e6xxx_atu_getnext(chip, fid, &addr);
>  		if (err)
> -			break;
> +			return err;
>  
>  		if (addr.state == GLOBAL_ATU_DATA_STATE_UNUSED)
>  			break;
>  
> -		if (!addr.trunk && addr.portv_trunkid & BIT(port)) {
> -			bool is_static = addr.state ==
> -				(is_multicast_ether_addr(addr.mac) ?
> -				 GLOBAL_ATU_DATA_STATE_MC_STATIC :
> -				 GLOBAL_ATU_DATA_STATE_UC_STATIC);
> +		if (addr.trunk || (addr.portv_trunkid & BIT(port)) == 0)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (obj->id == SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_FDB) {
> +			struct switchdev_obj_port_fdb *fdb;
>  
> +			if (!is_unicast_ether_addr(addr.mac))
> +				continue;
> +
> +			fdb = SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_FDB(obj);
>  			fdb->vid = vid;
>  			ether_addr_copy(fdb->addr, addr.mac);
> -			fdb->ndm_state = is_static ? NUD_NOARP : NUD_REACHABLE;
> -
> -			err = cb(&fdb->obj);
> -			if (err)
> -				break;
> +			if (addr.state == GLOBAL_ATU_DATA_STATE_UC_STATIC)
> +				fdb->ndm_state = NUD_NOARP;
> +			else
> +				fdb->ndm_state = NUD_REACHABLE;
>  		}
> +
> +		err = cb(obj);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
>  	} while (!is_broadcast_ether_addr(addr.mac));

Humm, maybe i'm reading this patch wrong....

This function is called mv88e6xxx_port_db_dump_one(). But i don't see
a way out of the while loop, after dumping one. It seems to dump the
whole table until it reaches the end marker, which is the MAC
broadcast address.

Should we rename this function, drop the _one?

       Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ