linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 RESEND] tty/n_gsm.c: use gsm->num to remove mux itself from gsm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160831140138.GA13669@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:01:38 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com,
        alan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 RESEND] tty/n_gsm.c: use gsm->num to remove mux itself
 from gsm_mux[]

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:37:51PM +0800, xinhui wrote:
> From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
> gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop
> traverse in gsm_cleanup_mux().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> change from V1:
> 	lock is also held for the if()
> ---
>  drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Doesn't apply to my tree :(