lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:50:18 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, tony@...mide.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, russ.dill@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to
 the regulator tree

On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:31:14AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > The patch
> 
> > >    mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe
> 
> > Why did you take this patch?
> 
> You acked it, that's saying that you're OK with the patch and are
> expecting someone else to apply it.

No it doesn't, you made that up. :)

I know when you and some others Ack a patch, that's what you mean, but
you've been working with me for long enough to know that's not what I
mean when I Ack a patch.  I do it as an indication that I've reviewed
the patch and I'm happy with it.  Most MFD patches that have
dependencies tend to come through the MFD tree.  If that's not the
case, my Ack is usually backed up with a "I expect this patch to go
through the X tree".

> > I now have a merge conflict.
> 
> > Did you provide a pull-request that I can use to resolve?
> 
> The following changes since commit 29b4817d4018df78086157ea3a55c1d9424a7cfc:

Thanks.

>   Linux 4.8-rc1 (2016-08-07 18:18:00 -0700)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git tags/tps65218-ver-check
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to f11fa1796a4b4f8c6d4ced37e8824276ec57057d:
> 
>   mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe (2016-08-10 18:21:55 +0100)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> mfd: tps65218: Add hardware version check
> 
> This will be used for quirks by some function drivers.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Tero Kristo (1):
>       mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe
> 
>  drivers/mfd/tps65218.c       | 9 +++++++++
>  include/linux/mfd/tps65218.h | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)



-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ