linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] x86: 32-bit compatible C/R on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2016 08:18:46 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 0x7f454c46@...il.com,
        luto@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        x86@...nel.org, gorcunov@...nvz.org, xemul@...tuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] x86: 32-bit compatible C/R on x86_64


* Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com> wrote:

> Changes from v3:
> - proper ifdefs around vdso_image_32
> - missed Reviewed-by tag

>  arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.c         | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c       |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/compat.h     |  8 ++--
>  arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/signal.h |  6 +++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h     |  4 ++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/vdso.h       |  2 +
>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h |  6 +++
>  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c      | 25 ++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c          |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/signal.c          | 20 +++++-----
>  arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c   | 34 ++++++++++++++--
>  fs/binfmt_elf.c                   | 23 ++++-------
>  kernel/signal.c                   |  7 ++++
>  13 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

Ok, this series looks good to me - does anyone have any objections?

Thanks,

	Ingo