lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 1 Sep 2016 08:34:10 +0200
From:   Jorik Jonker <jorik@...pendief.biz>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] dts: sun8i-h3: add i2c0/i2c1 SoC peripherals

Hi,

(trying again in plaintext, sorry for the HTML spam...)

A bit tricky to reply to two mails in one, as I think my reply relates
to both, but here it goes.

On 1 September 2016 at 04:42, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:30 AM,  <jorik@...pendief.biz> wrote:
>> From: Jorik Jonker <jorik@...pendief.biz>
>>
>> This enables the i2c0/i2c1 peripherals of the SoC. There is actually a third
>> controller, but I do not have a board on hands on which i2c2 is exposed in such
>> a way that I can verify that it works.
>
> If they are listed in the manual, and the interrupts, clocks, resets, pins
> all exist, that is good enough for me.

That sounds sensible, I will do that in v3.

> These pinmuxes are the only ones possible for each peripheral.
> Please drop the _a suffix and the @0 address for both of them.

Agreed. But: I think the same goes for UARTs 0-3, of which 0-1 have a pinmux
following the _a / @0 syntax in current kernel. There are not really options
here, except leaving out RTS/CTS on uarts1-3, which one could do in a
board-specific pinmux.

Moreover, I could put all the pinmux-peripheral associations for H3 in the DTSI,
removing them from the DTS files (including already existing), as the
associations themselves are not really board specific, right?

Best,
Jorik

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ