[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160901093420.GH4921@dell>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:34:20 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, tony@...mide.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, russ.dill@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to
the regulator tree
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:23:08AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > That's the standard meaning I'm afraid, you're going to confuse people
> > > if you do that. I'd suggest using a different tag if you want to do
> > > this, probably make one up.
>
> > Reviewed-by-BUT-DONT-TAKE-IT-YOU-FIEND: <me>
>
> > :)
>
> > Temporary-Acked-by-[to go through MFD tree]: <me>
>
> > Suggestions?
>
> Reviwed-for-MFD-by: ?
Okay, done. Thanks for your suggestion.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists