linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dts: s3c2416: Use macros for pinctrl configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:17:13 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, javier@....samsung.com,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dts: s3c2416: Use macros for pinctrl configuration

On Thursday, September 1, 2016 1:12:18 PM CEST Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > 
> > Shouldn't macros that are also used by s3c* be named as
> > SAMSUNG_PIN_FUNC_2 etc. (s3c* SoCs are not Exynos)?
> 
> Right, this is the inconsistency. The problem with "samsung" prefix is
> that there is no guarantee it will be like that for newer SoCs. How
> about one of:
> 1. using the oldest prefix (S3C24XX in this case),
> 2. duplicating them per SoC family (so S3C24XX, S3C64XX, EXYNOS).
> ?

I'd suggest living with the inconsistency and using EXYNOS as the prefix,
as that is the most common one these days, even if the other ones
predate it.

	Arnd