[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v67UYe_7Et5NfpJCHykT+JO4VokHtmgXeHTkUBpT+6pp2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 21:25:28 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@...atchpost.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] Add mixer controls: Line-In,
FM-In, Mic 2, Capture Source, Differential Line-In.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Danny Milosavljevic
<dannym@...atchpost.org> wrote:
> Hi Chen-Yu,
>
>> I have a few patches that introduce SOC_DAPM_DOUBLE, so you can share a
>> control between left/right channels. IMHO it makes the userspace mixer
>> less confusing.
>
> I definitely agree that cutting down on the number of sliders would be good.
> I do a double-take every time I open alsamixer - and I *added* these
> sun4i widgets :)
>
> It would be good if your patch series was queued and I could use SOC_DAPM_DOUBLE
> in a future version of my patch.
>
> Can you post it?
I'll try to make some time.
> Since it changes user space-visible API whether I group the widgets or not we
> have to be careful about it. So far my patch has not been merged which is good
> for API stability I guess.
>
> I wondered about why there's a SOC_DOUBLE_TLV but no SOC_DAPM_DOUBLE before,
> so it's good to know there's no deep reason.
AFAIU DAPM can't handle multiple channels. SOC_DAPM_ENUM_DOUBLE being the
exception, as for enums both channels are controlled together, so you don't
run into the problem of having to figure out which channel to connect or
disconnect.
> That said, I'd have to remove the distinction between Left Mixer and Right
> Mixer then. Right now it does distinguish.
>
> Removing the distinction would remove noteworthy routes like
>
> { "Right Mixer", "Left DAC Playback Switch", "Left DAC" },
>
> (not a typo). Would that be OK?
The SOC_DAPM_DOUBLE controls are to be shared between the left/right widgets.
See: https://github.com/wens/linux/commit/ea8ce9e865635595c73bc8f7eecd711d7500f8b2
sun6i_codec_mixer_controls is shared by the "Left Mixer" and "Right Mixer"
widgets. (Not shown in the patch.)
So you would still have:
{ "Left Mixer", "DAC Playback Switch", "Left DAC" },
{ "Right Mixer", "DAC Playback Switch", "Right DAC" },
This is what the DAPM diagram looks like on my A31:
https://wens.tw/dapm.pdf
The routes are not exported to userspace, not counting debugfs.
Only the controls are.
Hope this explains things.
Regards
ChenYu
> Well, let's see how it will work out.
>
> In the mean time I added the second regmap and the quirks and will post another
> patch series for comments.
>
> Cheers,
> Danny
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists